Seven Habits of High Successful People by Stephen Covey

Law of Mirath Essays

Law of Mirath Essays Law of Mirath Paper Law of Mirath Paper Inheritance could also be dined as the terminology used to mean the science or method of division of the property of the deceased person among his/her successors. Muhammad Dashiki, a great and famous Muslim Jurist had defined succession as a science by which persons (heirs) who inherit are distinguished from those who do not; the knowledge also ascertain in most cases, the quantum of the shares each inheritor is entitled to take. It all centers around the estate left by a deceased person. The science of Mirth is Shari gives rules which guide as to who inherits and who is to be inherited and what shares go to the heirs. The rules of succession are based on the principles that property which belonged to the deceased should devolve on those who by reason of consanguinity or marital relations have the strongest claim to benefit from it. The death of a person brings about transfer of most of his rights and obligation to persons who survive him. The transmissible rights includes all rights to property as well as rights connected with property and other dependent rights, such as debt, right to compensation and the reimbursable obligations which are capable of being satisfied out of the deceases estate. There are some verses of the Curran which refers to inheritance mirth in one way or the other. For instance in the following verses. To Allah belongs the inheritance of the heavens and the earth; and Allah is well acquainted with all that you do. L The prophet of Allah (Karri) have also prayed to Allah to be given successor to inherit him where he says or said:- And remember Karri, when he cried to his Lord: O my Lord! Leave me not without off-spring, though you are the best of inheritors. 2 The one concerning the prophet of Islam, Muhammad (SAW) where the people of Aquarius in Make resorted to machination and taunts against him. They used to say about him that he was a man with no posterity referring to the early death of his sons. One of them once remarked, Do not be bothered with him; he will die without descendant and that will be the end of his mission. Thus, one could simply say, mirth is concern with the heir, the estate left by the ceases person, ten moment AT Illustrating ten estates all toner relents wanly are capable of being satisfies and the classes of the heirs. The Muslim law of inheritance takes into account the fact that the property of the deceased should be applied primary to the support of persons who were entitled to be first supported by the deceased in his life time, and who have greatly suffered by his death. The Muslim law of succession is very important, in fact it is even one of the most important aspect of the family law with its establish rules and regulations that is guiding it. There is even a prophetic sayings, conveyed by Bin Major and Dark Quinn in the epitome of Djakarta al Quarter, declares: Try to learn the knowledge of Afraid: teach this knowledge to the youth: the knowledge of Afraid is half of (the whole religions knowledge. It will be this knowledge that my mama will forget first. With the above Tahiti we can see how great importance is the acquisition of the knowledge of inheritance that knowing it amount to knowing half the religious knowledge. With the death off person, his female relatives and daughters became a co-sharer with their male counterpart as stated in the following verses of the Holy Curran: From what is left by parents and those nearest related there is a hare for men and a share for women whether the property be small or large a determinate charge. Unlike during the pre-lilacs era where females were denied the right of inheritance from the property of their deceased relatives and even considered them as part of the inheritance to be inherited together with the estate. In the law of succession, property of the deceased person are divided among his heirs in a democratic basis, instead of handing it all over to the eldest son, as it used to be during the Auxiliary period. It also takes in to consideration those closest relatives who were pendent on the deceased. When he was alive and made them to have a greatest benefit. Other relatives are also considered for inheritance like brother, sister, uncle, son of sister. There is on favoritism in the sharing of the property or estate left, and in the will where by the testator shows his or her preference to one person over the other by giving much to him or her and none or very little to the others. Allowance is also made for bequest, if the testator wishes to help a person or charitable cause. The making of a bequest is encouraged by the holy prophet, but t should not exceed one third of the total property, and should not be in favor of one of the heirs, but to the people outside the heirs or charitable organization or mosque and schools. Bequest or will is encouraged even before the final introduction of the Islamic law of inheritance where it says. It is prescribed when death approaches any of you, if he leaves any goods, that he make a bequest to parent and next if kin, according to a reasonable usage. This is due from Allah fearing person. If any one changes the bequest after hearing it, the guilt shall be on those who make the change. For Allah hears and knows all things. From all that has been said above, one can say that the rights and duties of the individual do not end with his death. This is illustrated by the rules of inheritance wanly regulate want must De cone rater ten eaten AT ten owner Ana Detour ten Tall division of the property among the heirs. The people in charge of disposing or dividing the estate are strictly warned to have the same fear in their mind as then would have if they had left a helpless family behind. They are to observe the principle of Justice, be kind and helpful.

United Monarchy Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

United Monarchy - Essay Example In contradiction, their neighbours were polytheists and worshipped idols of God, and this was a constant temptation for Israelites. There was God’s law which guided Israelites to live righteously but Israelites constantly failed and there was a pattern to this which was recorded by the judges. This pattern was observed prior and during the period of United Monarchy, and can be seen as an explanation of the events: A leader is given by Yahweh to guide Israelites in the righteous path and observe Torah People do not follow and comply by this as they indulge in social injustice or idolatry, or sometimes both. That is, they act against the will of God People are punished for above by God in order to get them back to the righteous path and faithfulness. Punishment is mainly in the form of an attack by the neighbouring people As a result, people turn to God to save them and repent for what they had done A new leader is given by God who saves them from the enemy and the faith in god is restored. The cycle starts again and continues the same way It was established from the above that loyalty to Yahweh would mean prosperity while non-compliance to God’s Torah would result inevitably in disaster. This ideology of one god and the pattern discussed above play an important role in beginning and end of United Monarchy. ... All the tribes of Israelites were led by judges while most of their neighbours where led by kings and threats of attacks and invasions loomed large. This is when the people started demanding a centralised form of government with a single king leading all the tribes. The idea of having a king made great sense to tackle the situation and streamline all their resources and energies to fighting the outside invaders. On the other hand, the idea of having a king was in many ways contradicting the religious beliefs of Israelites. Israelites believed that God was their king and having a human king would be in all sense rejecting the leadership of God. Also Israel was supposed to be a â€Å"holy nation† unlike other nations. There was opposition to having a human king but the pressure was strong to have a permanent human king like other nations at the time. Samuel, the judge, is asked to identify the king to lead the nation but he warns that there would be many negative consequences of having centralised government and there is no guarantee of good leadership. Also he points out that: â€Å"Israelites suffered military defeat because of their infidelity to God not for the lack of king (1Sm 12:9-11). Not even a king will be able to save Israel from the consequences of a disobeying God. In this respect, the institution of monarchy will change nothing.† This cautionary warning is in accordance with the beliefs of Israelites that non-compliance with God’s Torah will lead to dire consequences. Therefore, irrespective of having a king or not if people do not follow the path of God, they will be punished until they vow to walk in the right path again. This ideology sounds right and to go by this, there is no need for the Israelites to have a king as long as

Philosophy Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words - 1

Philosophy - Essay Example Basing our argument on philosophy, it can be noted that the previous philosophy or rather the ancient philosophy do not give out the same picture as it used to be some years ago. As the way of life changes, so are things like philosophy and sociology just to mention but a few. However, before a change can fully be implemented, there must be a motivation. The same applies to the modern philosophy. Before attaining its current state, there was a motivational appeal, which our ancestors anchored on to foster the attainment of their desires. First, our ancestors had a sense of recognition in that they recognized the existence of a new path that had departed from the medieval scholasticism. From that point, they started to refer to their own philosophizing style as â€Å"modern.† Notably, the recognition of medieval scholasticism departed path designating the modern philosophy. Secondly, the early philosophers acknowledged the Greek philosophical schools, after which they breathed life back to them. The philosophers believed that the schools contained the middle age’s lost vitality, which they knew would help them drive to the modern philosophy. In short, education was a pertinent motivator to the modern philosophy. In other words, education laid a foundation to proper thinking, and so it motivated the philosophy to their destiny. Thirdly, freedom formed another motivator to the current philosophy. Through freedom, the early philosophers got the chance and time to move freely out of the oppression of the Catholic Church. In doing so, they stood on a good position of defending themselves from the trouble they experienced with the religious and legal authorities. It is noteworthy that most innovative philosophers always experienced impeachment as heresy. However, freedom made them overcome these accusations. Lastly, scientific achievements in fields s uch as biology, engineering, chemistry, and astronomy staged the early philosophers on a good platform of

Raw materials transport costs Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Raw materials transport costs - Essay Example Carriage inwards are the costs that are incurred as a result of transporting raw materials into a firm, these costs should be added to the value of goods purchased, and this means that the cost of raw materials should include the value of the goods purchased plus the transportation costs incurred by the firm in transporting these raw materials. Carriage outward is the cost of transportation of final or finished goods to the customer; these costs are treated as expenses and therefore are recorded in the profit and loss account as an expense.Therefore from the above discussion on the cost of transportation which are carriage inward and outward it is evident that carriage inward which is the cost incurred in transporting raw materials into the firm should be included in the valuation of inventory and therefore require that they are added to the cost of raw materials, carriage outward which is the transportation of goods to the customer should be treated as an expense and therefore shoul d not be included in the valuation of inventory.Work in progress is a term used to goods that are not yet finished goods, their value is included in the valuation of inventory, overhead costs are those costs that cannot be directly traced to a particular products example rent and security costs, these costs are assigned to the product using an appropriate method whereby their cost is assigned to cost objects . Work in progress is calculated by adding up the direct materials costs, direct labor costs and the overhead costs, the overhead costs are assigned to the unit of production using an appropriate method, example the overhead costs at Lehman ltd are assigned to products using machine hours. Overhead costs should be included in the valuation of inventory, the costs of produced goods should include direct materials, direct labor costs and overhead costs, in this case the following overheads are included: Factory rent, rates and insurance 50,000 sales office expenses 240,000 factory security 30,000 factory heat, light and power 450,000 sales commissions and selling costs 120,000 depreciation of machinery 230,000 depreciation of sales force vehicles 70,000 total 1,190,000 The overhead costs are assigned to products on the basis of machine hours and in this case it is evident that there were 10000 machine hours, however 500 machine hours are included in work in progress, therefore for the finished goods have utilized 9500 machine hours. For the finished goods the following overhead cost should be assign to each product: 1,190,000/9500 = 125.26 Therefore each finished good should be assigned 125.26 per machine hour it consumes. For the work in progress they have consumed 500 machine hours, should be assigned the overhead cost depending on a percentage set, example the company may decide that for the work in progress the overhead costs will be assigned at 50%, if this is the case the work in progress overhead cost will be 62.63 per machine hour. Finished goods: The table below summarizes the cost incurred by these goods and some costs that the goods may incurred, the following table summarizes the gross profit that will be gained as a result of modification and sale of these products. Stock Line A () B() C() selling price 50000 20000 22000 Costs incurred to date 40000 10000 15000 modification costs 10000 4000 4000 marketing costs 5000 4000 5000 cost of production 55000 18000 24000 gross profit -5000 2000 -2000 We calculate the cost of production by adding up all the cost that the goods have incurred and those that are to be icnured, to get gross profit we subtract cost of production from the selling price which in this case stands for the revenue that is to be gained, the gross profit for product A and C is negative while product B has a positive gross profit. Therefore product B will gain a profit and therefore it is best to modify and sell the product, for the other product the firm may

Development of Reality TV Genre

Development of Reality TV Genre How are reality TV shows constructed and how do they challenge ideas about the television audience? Everyone has to have come across a reality television show, at least once while watching television, since the genre has become one of the most popular genres of television programming in our contemporary society and keeps on becoming more and more enjoyed by people worldwide. Ever since this, considerably new, television genre has appeared a lot of changes in the ways of entertainment, television programme constructions and audience studies have been noticed. That is why several studies have been contacted around the genre, in order to better identify and explain it, in relation to the audience and other media theories. The views around it between scholars though, are divided, between the ones who support the genre and ‘others who consider it to be voyeuristic, cheap, sensational television’ (Hill, 2005). Regardless of the two opinions, the reality genre becoming one of the most discussed subjects in media studies is a fact and in this essay I will try, based on several academics’ research, to identify what the reality genre is, how it was developed through the years, from what programmes it has originated, which subgenres it has produced and how those subgenres influence the television programme production today and finally, how the reality genre’s concepts challenge several ideas about the audience reception, taking into consideration the latter’s point of view. It is undeniable that television has a big impact on the ways people spend their free time and each genre of television programmes has its own impact on audiences and society, with probably the reality genre being the most controversial one. Due to several studies around and different opinions about the genre there is no specific definition about it. It is generally thought to be the genre which documents unscripted, real-life situations of ordinary people (Hill, 2005). The genre is more focused on drama and entertainment contexts rather than simply educating the audience, since it usually encompasses unscripted dramas, games, tasks and just about any competitions that make it more fun to watch. Reality television genre first appeared during the 1950’s as a new form of factual television and social record for post-war observers, based on Allen Fund’s work in 1947, which was a reality television series called Candid Camera focused on hidden cameras that filmed ordinary people facing unusual situations (similar to the latter Just for Laughs: Gags). Even though some people viewed this technique as an invasion of privacy, others viewed it as a ‘valuable educational visual record’ (Murray and Ouellette, 2004) and thus the genre continued to develop. The growth of tabloid journalism, documentary television and popular entertainment during the 1980s, influenced the reality genre even more, resulting in new hybrid programming, developing reality television as we know it today (Hill, 2005). Studies around reality television have become an important concept in media research, since the ways in which the genre works influence new types of audience gratifications, as well as media effects, due to the way they are constructed. Usually, reality television shows are directed by segment producers or story editors, who assemble storyboards and shooting scripts to make the shows happen. Since these people are not acknowledged by the Writers Guild of America as normal writers, they cost less than what a drama writer would cost (Hill, 2005). Additionally, since no actors or sets are required for reality shows to be made, the cost of production is much cheaper than the majority of other television genres, which explains why they are so famous and massively produced. In order for a reality show to be produced and eventually successful though, certain aspects need to be taken into consideration. People tend to get easily bored of a television programme and can easily switch off their television or change to another channel. In order to keep them interested, reality shows need to have highly marketable concepts and subjects to gain their audience’s attention. Catchy titles that provoke conversations and smart catch-phrases, which tell you exactly what to expect to watch but at the same time intrigue your curiosity and imagination, are usual characteristics of such shows. Reality television shows also need to provide exactly what their name suggests, ‘reality’. Focusing more on storylines containing elements of competition, potential for conflict, tasks, winning prizes, reality show producers aim to capture real-life situations about ordinary people, exactly how they happen in front of the camera. Usually, in every reality show there is a host who or a voiceover that explains to the audience what is going on, who they are watching and what they will be doing during the show. In order to convince the audience that what they are watching is real and unscripted, they attempt to stimulate real life situations and reactions from the people who participate in the shows and by surveillance with cameras, they make the private life visible to everyone. The idea of non-actors or professionals participating in each show and the non-scripted presentation of events make reality programmes an unpredictable source of entertainment for the audience and the idea is enhanced by the fact that people feel like they are active participants in these situations, removing them somehow from being a passive audience. One of our era’s most popular reality show has been the singing competition series Idols (also known as Superstar), which first aired in the UK in 2001. Equipped with all the basic reality show elements, such as mass auditioning of ordinary, non-famous people, audience participation with people voting their favourite artists from home, unscripted dialogs and reactions by the participants, as well as the judging panel, live per formances, backstage drama and marketable concepts, the show has come across huge success worldwide. The main purpose of the programme is to discover the ‘idol’ in each of its series, with that idol being the most talented singer who competes in the show. Auditions are held and the judges choose the participants, who eventually compete with each other during live performances and the winner is announced after only two singers are left in the show and the one with the most votes, from the audience and the judges, wins a money prize and a recording contract. Even though the reality formats share some common elements, the genre in general is made up of various diverse and distinctive subgenres that resulted from the mixture and hybridization of other prior, original programmes and it is this hybridization of successful genres that gives reality television its strong market values. Influenced by genres such as soap opera, documentary, sports or competition shows, reality genre is a very broad category and therefore it is quite hard to understand reality television ‘without considering its place within the context of other types of audio-visual documentation’ (Hill, 2005). As a result, there are several subgenres of reality television programmes such as, docu-dramas, game shows, dating-based competitions, self-improvement /makeover shows, hidden camera shows or talk shows. Docu-soaps or ‘fly-on-the-wall’ documentaries are the combination of the traditional observational documentary television with soap opera and they create a fictional setting to represent a series of events, with cameras set up to follow unscripted situations as they happen. The film crew is not seen or acknowledged by the reality stars and contrawise to traditional documentaries, which are often limited to one episode, docu-soaps span as a series of episodes, edited and scripted to follow normal people’s lives. A British example of a docu-soap, is the ‘fly-on-the-wall’ documentary series called Airport, which was aired between 1996 and 2008, based at the London Heathrow Airport. The series followed the daily activities of passengers and staff of the airport. The dramatic behind the scenes plot and some memorable recurring characters, gave the show its docu-soaps feel. Make over shows such as Extreme Makeover, feature real people who present their own situations and life stories to explain why they are in need of a self-transformation. Extreme Makeover aired between 2002 and 2007 in the USA, with people volunteering to receive complete makeovers, including plastic surgery, exercise programmes, hairdressing and wardrobe renovation by beauty ‘experts’. Screened in three major parts; before, during and after the makeover shows like that focus on beauty and outer appearance in order to enhance people’s self-esteem. Also, the elements of surprise by the family members, who cannot see their relative until the end of their transformation, enhance the audience’s curiosity and excitement. Another successful reality television subgenre is the talk show genre, with programmes such as The Oprah Winfrey Show or Dr. Phill. Shows like that feature a host who interviews guests or discusses a chosen topic using the studio as a platform to inspire, educate or entertain the audience, usually offering people, who watch fro m their homes, the chance to call and express their opinions about the topics discussed live. Probably though, the most popular subgenre of reality programmes is the game show genre, with shows such as Survivor and Big Brother, which have had huge success worldwide over the years. With Survivor featuring isolated contestants in the wildness who compete against each other for money and other prizes and Big Brother, featuring a group of people known as ‘housemates’, living together in a specially constructed house, isolated from the outside world and competing with each other, facing weekly evictions in order to win a cash prize, both shows are based on competition and elimination concepts. Each episode of each show has the contestants faced against certain tasks, building up suspense and ensuring that the audience will watch until the very end to see the final result. With the participants being under 24 hour surveillance and all their actions observed, the audience can relate to them and decide who they like and who they do not. Generally, reality television is one of the most popular television genres and with all its subgenres falls under the category of factual television, which documents non-fiction television programming and actual real life events. The fact that reality shows create a mixture of information and entertainment concepts for their audience is generally known as infotainment and is also another factor of the genre’s worldwide success (Hill, 2005). Apart from the ways reality television works though, it is also important to identify its success taking into consideration the audience’s point of view and how this genre challenges specific ideas about it. In the past, television asked only that people would sit back and relax, as scripted dramas, sitcoms or documentaries supplied passive entertainment and education. Reality television on the other hand, offers audience participation and shortens the distance between television celebrities and viewers. It is no wonder then that ‘one of the reasons the reality genre has been so powerful in the television market, is that it appeals to younger adults in particular’ (Hill, 2005). The reason is that people enjoy watching the elements of drama and competition of reality shows, since they can easily get attached to some of the characters, relate to them and feel part of their actions. They like to know what goes on behind closed doors, they find it intriguing and reali ty shows give them the chance to satisfy their curiosity. Also, reality shows reflect a freedom of speech that was not there before, since people can now comment about what they do and do not like about a show or a character and also change the outcome of a show with their votes. But no matter how much viewers enjoy the various reality formats, they are also distrustful of the authenticity, precisely because they know that the people’s stories are presented to them in an entertaining manner, and because of that they are sceptical about how staged and scripted those stories are. There have also been several critiques and arguments about the reality genre and most of them are focused around the ‘reality’ of it, since the ways in which these shows reflect reality are questionable. The detractors of the genre claim that the reality of it is inaccurate, since the dialogs or situations presented are staged and scripted by the producers, or even the choosing of the participants in each show is done specifically, in order for certain participants to have high chances of engaging into conflict with each other. Also, producers can attempt to stimulate several events to present them as real, with various formats or editing techniques, which can create different degrees of ‘reality’ (Hill, 2005). For example, the way particular environments, related to each show, are unreal, because of how they are specifically constructed by the producers for the needs of the show or how the day by day activities, tasks or competitions that participants face are also controlled by the production team (e.g. the large house of Big Brother, or the tasks of the Survivor participants). Other critiques focus around how certain shows, like The X-Factor: Auditions for example, depend on humiliating and exploiting participants that might not be as talented or suitable to be on television, in order to increase the ratings of the show, or depend on the show’s voyeuristic elements, such as performances of intimate elements in public, in order to satisfy some viewers’ needs to observe other people’s lives (Bagdasarov et al. 2010). Also, some shows rely on stereotypes along with humiliation of participants, resulting to more criticism about them. A famous incident of people judging someone on their appearance instead of their talent is Susan Boyle’s audition (YouTube) for the reality programme Britain’s Got Talent in 2009. By the time she had set food on the stage, the audience, as well as the judges, were expecting her to have no talent and make a fool of herself, because of her modest introduction on the stage and her age. But after she started singing and proved to be extremely talented, everyone was applauding in shock. Stereotyping is a usual element of reality shows and many people criticize the genre for having a negative cultural impact, since such notions and ideas are easily spread and absorbed by society, especially if they come from the most popular television shows. Additionally, based on Blumler and Katz’s (1974) uses and gratifications approach, the audience is active and able to select the media content that, based on their gratifications, will satisfy their needs. Therefore, their viewing motives can help the television programme producers predict activity (Godlewski and Perse, 2010). Also, reality television seems to fulfil the alleged, by the uses and gratifications approach, audience needs, which are surveillance, personal relationships, personal identity and escapism. That way they provide a type of show suitable for everyone’s taste. Based on the aforementioned research though, how real can reality television formats be considered and what does the genre’s huge success show about how the audience responds to it? If people enjoy watching reality television programmes then they are also aware of how they can be edited to appear real and authentic to them, when in fact they are not. They are able to identify what they perceive to be good and bad programming and they are not usually watching reality shows to educate themselves about several subjects or understand more about the world. On the contrary, people watch reality shows to entertain themselves, to relax after a tiring day, to laugh and to feel intrigued and excited. They know that the more ‘real’ and entertaining a show appears to them, the less real and authentic they believe it to be (Hill, 2005), therefore they observe the participants of these shows in order to witness how people handle awkward situations and social dilemmas in front o f cameras. All things considered, it is undeniable that the reality television genre is still one of the most popular genres today and even if audiences are aware of the genre’s illusion of reality, it still has a big appeal on them because it amuses them and because of its entertaining and relaxing concepts. For a short period of time, people can feel like a part of the show, a little closer to being the celebrities and the stars of television. Therefore, scripted or not, real or not, the reality genre will continue to be successful and as television programmes continue to develop and allow more interaction between the programmes and their audiences, it is very important that research around the interactive forms of reality television, which encourage increased audience activity, continue to be contacted. BIBLIOGRAPHY Godlewski, Lisa R., and Elizabeth M. Perse. Audience Activity And Reality Television: Identification, Online Activity, And Satisfaction. Communication Quarterly 58.2 (1976): 148-169. Hall, Alice. Viewers Perceptions Of Reality Programs. Communication Quarterly 54.2 (1976): 191-211. Hill, Annette. Reality TV: Audiences And Popular Factual Television. London: Routledge, 2005. Murray, Susan, and Laurie Ouellette. Reality TV. New York: New York University Press, 2004. YouTube,. Susan Boyle Audition HD FULL. N.p., 2015. Web. 08 May 2015.

Gang Intelligence Methods in Law Enforcement Essay -- essays research

GANG INTELLIGENCE METHODS IN LAW ENFORCEMENT The American headlines of any large city will site killings on street corners, robberies, assaults, intimidation, and drug interaction. While not all-criminal activity is associated with gangs, the 780,000 strong members do account for a large majority of the problems that are plaguing America. There is no one-way to stop gang activity in one single swipe, but through a combination of cooperation, education, and training techniques law enforcement can minimize the gang’s movements and even stop a crime before it is committed.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  A gang is defined as a group of individuals with the same objective that are bound together by a bond of trust. The majority of gangs are young people, but not every gang member is in his prime. The people that make up a gang are usually trying to achieve something, either money, respect, freedom from the oppression of another gang or law enforcement agency, the need to belong to something greater than themselves, or a combination of any of these. The individual that joins a gang is usually after the same goal that the gang is seeking to obtain.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Different gangs have different characteristics, but all gangs possess at least one: A hierarchy. Whether the gang is a small local crew that never moves out of the neighborhood or a larger well organized team that controls an entire district, there will always be a leader. The leader of the group is the focus of gang-related law enforcement intelligence investigations. Often times the leader of a gang may already be incarcerated, and is still communicating and giving orders from within the walls. The leader is the individual that is usually the strongest member of the group with the most charisma, not necessarily the smartest member of the group or the member that has been in the group the longest.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Membership in a gang does not necessarily mean that the person is uneducated. Some gang members may have positions within the law enforcement communities (Sulc, 65) and some gang members earn college degrees in business, law enforcement, finance, etc. This type of education whether formal or on-the-job will make the gang even stronger. If an individual cannot afford to go to college, this type of scholarship program could be an incentive to stay or join up with ... ...mericans understand that catching criminals and bringing down a gang ring is not an easy task. As long as there is an active show of interaction between law enforcement and the public, than the likelihood of information sharing is always greater.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  The gang related activity of America cannot be extinguished overnight, but understanding that the fight against such crime is not an easy task will help win the American people’s support. The average citizen is enraged as well as discouraged by the acts of criminal gang forces, and the majority of Americans stand behind law enforcement already. The only way to put a dent in the criminal gang forces of America is through a combination of cooperation, education, and training techniques. WORKS CITED Lowenthall, M.M. INTELLIGENCE: FROM SECRETS TO POLICY. Washington, DC: CQ Press, 2000. Peterson, M.B. APPLICATIONS IN CRIMINAL ANALYSIS. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers, 1998. Peterson, M.B. INTELLIGENCE 2000: REVISING THE BASIC ELEMENTS. Sacramento, CA: LEIU, 2000. Sulc, L.B. LAW ENFORCEMENT: COUNTER INTELLIGENCE. Shawnee Mission, KS: Varro Press, 1996.